web analytics

What Would Jean Cocteau Say About the Web?

Jean Cocteau (French poet and artist) died in 1963. We therefore don’t know what he’d say about the web; whether he’d be passionate about it or critical. But he said something else in an interview when he was explaining the design of a postal stamp with the portrait of Marianne, France’s national symbol. Turns out, Marianne was a bureaucrat’s wife, and so on Cocteau’s stamp there was this female head, not really heroic or even beautiful. The journalist asked if Marianne on the stamp was perhaps too typical.

Yes, maybe, – Cocteau replied, – but I think it’s good. When one is licked by so many it doesn’t pay to be too singular, lest one is licked with disgust.

I remembered this when I read Chris Brogan’s recent post – Is Your Web Presence Multi-use – and the commentary to it. Put simply, Brogan’s idea in the post is to encourage website owners to bear in mind that they are read by hundreds, if not thousands, different people. In addition to all the different things about those people, they may also speak a different language. The latter fact alone puts a whole new spin on the story.

Some commentators, though, were at odds with such suggestion. “It’s not possible to be all things to all people” and “isn’t the web is all about finding the niche and catering for it?” sum up the criticism amply.

I often find that we lock ourselves in a niche, either as producers or consumers. We think that we found the proverbial purple cow, but what few people remind us of is that the colour fades in the sun. The day will come when your cow is lilac or even white – and that’s not the same as purple. So you at least need to paint your cow once in a while, to freshen it up – which, in terms of a website, may mean changing its design, or putting a new spin on your niche subject.

I’d argue that it’s impossible to cater for a niche. On the one hand, there’s always a bigger picture, and if it’s possible to have your niche border on several supportive subjects, then why not? A blogger’s block often happens in a competitive niche. On the other hand, exactly how niche can you be? So, you may be making a website about scrap cars, but so are a few dozen of other people. What makes you different? How sustainable is your business? Imagine the worst case scenario: the day came when no-one wants to scrap their cars. What will you do? What will make your site – and your name – continue appearing in search results?

You therefore cannot be too niche, and at the same time you have to attract different people if you’re working on the web. Some will come for information; others will come to spend money. I’m one of the kind who believes in the possibility of blending humanism and business. And although it’s not possible to be all things to all people, there’s nothing wrong with making an impact on lives of many people – pretty much like what we’re seeing for over a week now since Michael Jackson is no more.

To round up – a quote from the magnificent Peter Blake, about what makes a person an icon: “You’ve got to have your own style. But not so that in a short while you’re out of fashion. It’s not about being fashionable; it’s just a look, a feel“. Perhaps, we can think of our web presence as if we’re Vivienne Westwood, and, should it be our vision, blend punk with tartan, even if this goes against what the savvy folks teach us. Or think of our web presence as if it’s Kate Moss. She can sniff crack; she can wear a dress in royal blue colour at the Queen’s dinner. But when a fashion journo asks people in the street “who is your fashion icon?“, we all know what the answer will often be.

The image is courtesy of Charles Blomefield, the leading specialist in French stamps.

Tweeji: How Afterlife Embraced the Virtual World


As we know, celebrities flock to Twitter to avoid the middle men, be they tabloids or paparazzi. Presumably, they want to speak to their audience directly. But it looks like even the Heaven is eagerly embracing the idea of social interaction and microblogging. Welcome Tweeji, the place where you can meet the dead celebrities who tweet.

Ever wondered why you send your prayers to Jesus with no avail? You may ask him this question directly, but chances are, right now he’s very busy recording a CD with Tupac Shakur. Oscar Wilde is contemplating life in his famous witticisms. Dante Alighieri, the author of The Divine Comedy, is travelling with Virgil somewhere in the Inferno’s bowles, which may explain why he is yet to notice Jesus. (I am secretly waiting to see his beloved Beatrice making an entry). Martin Heidegger is immersed in Hoelderlin, but tells Hannah Arendt that she is ever so close to him. Henry Miller is his usual sexual inspiration, while Confucius spreads the common wisdom in short rhymed messages. And Samuel Johnson, in the 195th year since his birth, revealed himself as an acquaintance of The Stone Roses. (I am sure The Stone Roses fans are pleased).

In all time of Twitter being around, this is surely the most daring addition to the myriad of Twitter-based fun applications. Tweeji certainly takes things to a totally new level where reality and virtual existence blur to the point of creepiness. Or maybe it just reminds us that there is life in the upper spheres. The strangest thing may be, of course, that Jesus and Buddha are considered “celebrities”… but they did have a human side to themselves, after all. And in the age when Beatles and the like have evidently been more popular than Jesus, isn’t that a call to leave the Church behind and speak directly to the “fans”?

How To Protect Your Ideas From Being Stolen?


WebProNews is currently taking on Digg.com showcasing how a story submitted by an “ordinary mortal” is ignored by the majority, whilst exactly the same submission by one of the elite Diggers soars freely on the front page. Ironically, I have had a conversation with a Cheshire-based SEO agency just before Christmas, and they asked me if I knew (or could suggest) any ways of getting “dugg”. I said what I believed was the real picture: that 1) there are cliques that stand on guard of their authority and that 2) the process of “digging” is a pure chain reaction. This is confirmed by the majority of Digg users who aren’t satisfied with the service:
“The coalition of outcasts has primarily blamed two Digg.com features pretty standard on Internet social networks: the ability to form friends lists and “shout” to those friends about news stories a user wants promoted”.

Forming friends and sending “shouts” is precisely the ‘chain-reaction’ mechanisms. But is it only peculiar of Digg.com? Or does Digg.com represent the world at work: a cluster of mutually supportive coalitions that keep an individual user at a distance while also being keen on feeding off his/her ideas?

On this occasion, WebProNews refers to Digg.com as a failed democratic model; however, ironically, Digg.com may be that very democratic model – at its worst, of course. Alexis de Tocqueville, a French aristocrat who is reportedly still studied in the States for all things democratic, predicted in his treatise that a democratic regime can degrade into the tyranny of many – exactly what we see on Digg.

Yet again, is it only Digg that we should blame? What about campaigns pro or contra something on Facebook? What about the whole nature of Social Media whereby you share the content only to find out that someone else has appropriated it? The example that is discussed on WebProNews involving Digg.com may not be entirely relevant, but it does give a perspective to the problem.
So, how to protect your ideas from being stolen?

As I write this, I must admit: I do not know the answer. Two things come to mind, however. One is a comment I recently had on my article drawing on the interview I made with Dave McKean. Turns out that The Jim Hanson Company were very positive about the artwork of Tanya Doskova, a Canadian artist who worked at the Company’s studios in London for a period of time. You will get the gist of the problem as you read the comments. I said to Tanya what I felt was well relevant to me at times. As once an insider of a huge media corporation, I am confident that my inkling about the ‘preferential’ attitude to the native citizens is grounded. This is not to accuse anyone of something bad; but this is not deny that ‘foreign’ and ‘alien’ are synonyms, after all.

The second is a seminar at the London Book Fair 2007. One of the talks centred precisely on the possibility of copyrighting an idea. We looked at what then was the very popular case of Dan Brown vs. Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh. The answer wasn’t bringing a relief to anyone of us who is concerned about the issue: you cannot copyright an idea. Indeed, if we suppose that all things exist as ideas, then imagine, say, Dante being issued with a copyright on the idea of Love. Just because he composed The Divine Comedy, to be sure.

For my part, I have never really publicised my ideas, and as far as writing goes, I very rarely let anyone read the text before it is finished. I am sure not to publish the entire text online (except for short stories or those that were inspired by a contemporary art work), but only a selection because – forgive me my audacity which is supported by comments I receive about my work – I think I do have brilliant ideas that just doesn’t visit some people. But this is different with blogging where the whole idea is about publishing and publicising your content.

Now, ideas are beautiful in that they are in the ether: if one idea didn’t visit me, it may surely land in someone else’s head. If this happens ‘naturally’, i.e. I didn’t mention this idea in another’s presence (a blog post included), then I don’t have a problem. But when I do mention those ideas and then I see other people trumpeting exactly the same (and by the look of it, they didn’t quite trumpet this idea before my mention) and without crediting me, I do ask: what do I do? Especially if I am still going to act on the idea that I voiced?

To an extent, this is a problem of pre-eminence: who was the first to mention something? But even if you can survive not being credited as the original communicator of an idea, the question remains: when and how should you start throwing your idea around, to gain feedback or support? To get back to that example with Digg.com and to use it symbolically, when should you submit your content to Digg?

By the look of it, unless you’re among the top users, you shouldn’t submit it at all. Yet Digg is but one of the places that operates as a ‘network’, and you may not be a part of it even if you seem to be. What to do? Maybe to follow Zizek who said that today the criticised and ostracised Socialists should recognise their legacy precisely because it is theirs and should know their facts better and thus make their critics play on their, Socialist, terms. Ignore ‘Socialist’, and you’ll find a plenty of individuals and smaller groups that are trying to use the Internet to promote their causes against networks of other individuals and groups. However hard it is, self-belief and the ability to see through the polite facade of today’s relations may be the only things that can get you through any difficult times. And to quote my preferred Dali, ‘the difference between Surrealists and me is that I am a Surrealist‘.

The illustration is the courtesy of WebProNews.

FF Film Festival Venues in Google Maps

I’ve made a map of all the venues, listing the dates when the events are held, just to give you the idea, and you can follow the link to the FFFF website in each of the entries, to find out more. Some of the workshops are taking place at The Met (Bury), The John Rylands Library in Deansgate, the WFA Media & Cultural Centre, and Zion Arts Centre.

Family Friendly Film Festival Venues 2008 in Google Maps (allows you to copy the link).

 

Schmap Liverpool for the iPhone

There has been much talk about iPhone. I particularly liked Robin Hamman’s documenting the growing queues outside the phone shop on 11th of July (left). I followed a few discussions on Facebook and elsewhere that centred on various aspects of iPhone, but then I received a Flickr mail from the Schmap team. Last year my photo of Liverpool’s Western Approaches was included in the e-version of Schmap Liverpool Guide, and now the photo is also available in Schmap for iPhone (right).

Schmap for iPhone has access to our full range of City Guides, plus a Local Search service powered by Yahoo!, and a unique Rotating Map feature that auto generates a map when you turn your iPhone sideways…

Interested? Go to Schmap for the iPhone to read more or to browse the city guides.

Break a Leg And Have a Break Using Google

I never thought that I would use the phrases “break a leg” and “have a break” to play on words, but here it goes. Just to let you know from the start, a series of pre-written posts will be appearing on my blog for some time in the future. As you might know, Blogger now allows you to schedule your posts, which I used a few times previously to test that the feature worked well. It did, and now I have no choice but to commit myself to it for a period of time – while I’m nursing my broken ankle.

Yes, playing on words. We use “break a leg!” when wishing luck to a person. (If I’m not mistaken, in German language they actually wish to “break a neck“). I suppose this is what my friends wished me when I left for Beck’s Canvas – and I did really well, as you may have read, seen and heard. Of course, they didn’t know that on my return, on my way into work, I’d actually break my ankle. I still cannot get my head around the fact that I did it, while wearing trainers and walking (not running) on the road that was perfectly plain (although it was a drizzly day). Then, of course, since this happened, I’ve been told at least three stories of really horrific accidents, one of which occurred in the kitchen. Also, in the news there was a story a couple of months ago of a Mexican donkey, who for whatever reason bit one man and kicked another, breaking the latter’s leg. The donkey was put into prison for misbehaviour; I suppose I could become the (wo)man who sued God, but that’s going to take too much of my energy. So, I console myself with the fact that my flat is not on the sunny side, it’s relatively shady here, and I am trying not to feel extremely gutted at how many things I am going to miss in 5 weeks of being off sick and in cast.

As I have to keep my leg up in the air all the time, and as I don’t use a Blackberry or suchlike for blogging, I thought I would be unable to blog. But, thankfully, I remembered about scheduling in Blogger, and was able to pre-write a few posts, to avoid disappearing for too long without a word.

Also, Google has recently rolled out their Knol: A Unit of Knowledge. I posted about Knol a year ago on the Russian blog, and I know a few readers there were interested in the financial opportunities of Knol (because, yes, you are going to be able to earn some money, provided you consent to the advertisement in your article). Back in 2007, Knol looked like an onslaught on Wikipedia. Indeed, all Knol articles have to be written under your real name, which is a welcome departure from a collectively (and not always well) edited people’s encyclopaedia. Having said so, one look at the Knol’s current home page makes you wonder if the whole feature may become an ex catedra space for medical professionals. Not that I don’t want to seek and find medical advice online… Thankfully, there are some reassuring Knols, e.g. Music in Capoeira by Johan Mengesha.

Yet the fact that Google allows advertising on Knols makes a prospective onslaught on Squidoo more plausible. You can use your Squidoo lenses to earn money for yourself or a charitable cause close to your heart, but now you can also do that through Google.

In short, in addition to diverse and sundry things from the past you can now use Google to: 1) pre-write and schedule your posts for future publishing; 2) write an authoritative article and earn money with it. I’m not sure how far Google has gone with Comments on the News feature they reported on planning to have back in August 2007, but surely there will be more Google-y things to come, anyway. May I suggest a personalised forecast for prospective leg-breakers, please?

Bolton Bodysnatchers: The Cost of a Typo

For the second day running I come across articles from the press that just cannot be lost for the posterity – they need to be preserved and cherished. And before you say anything, I (as all of us) am occasionally guilty of making an odd typo. But seeing examples like the one in this post just makes me be more attentive, especially when publishing online.

Paul Keaveney reports for The Bolton News that a thief snatched a handbag off an elderly lady’s shoulder, as she walked down the street. “The bag contained a purse with cash inside. The thief was a white and wore a blue tracksuit and a hooded top“. The robbery took place at 8.30 am on June 20th, in Brownlow Way in Bolton, and anyone with information is urged to call Bolton CID’s Robbery Unit, on 0161 856 5645.

But it is the current title of the story that prompted this post – click on the image below to see.


So, thanks to a typo, the thief snatched not just a bag, but even a shoulder – as my colleague pointed out, “thieves will nick anything these days”.

As for me, I remembered O’Henry’s quote: “A burglar who respects his art always takes his time before taking anything else”. I think the same should be true for thieves, journalists and online publishers alike.

Reporting Numbers in the Press: A Perspective

It seems that I keep remembering the pearls from George Mikes’s How to be an Alien. But how can I avoid doing so, when I get to see the screen shot of a story on CNN’s website? The story is not dissimilar to the one we had in the British news some time ago, about the severed female body remains found on the Scottish coast. The screen shot highlighted the inappropriate use of contextual advertising: the story is about severed feet being regularly found on the Canadian coast, so we get an ad for PutYourFeetUp, a house-moving company. I have just checked the site, but have not found the banner there, so I didn’t include the image of a screen shot in my post.

The CNN story is rather gruesome: for 11 months people in the town of Campbell River on Vancouver Island in British Columbia have been finding severed feet. The latest – 6th in number – has turned up in a shoe, the police report, and it can take weeks, if not months, to use DNA science to identify the body parts.

It was when I looked at the story highlights that I recalled the chapter “Journalism, or The Freedom of the Press” from Mikes’s bestseller. In the chapter, Mikes parodies the style of the 1930s-40s English tabloids, to showcase how a story of the rebellion on a remote island would be covered in the press. The fact he takes as a premise is that of a rebellion which was successfully put down, and 217 rebels were held captive during the island raid. The Times, in Mikes’s parody, would report on the number of captured rebels in the following way:

The number of revolutionaries captured cannot be safely stated, but it seems likely that the number is well over 216 but well under 218.

 

In the CNN story, despite the title “Sixth severed foot surfaces off Canadian coast”, the highlights read:

At least five other feet since August that have surfaced off Canadian shore” (my bolding – JD).

It looks like that when it comes to reporting numbers in the press, countries and time truly don’t matter.

Free One-Year Subscription to the Encyclopaedia Britannica

Earlier this week I read on TechCrunch‘s article about the Encyclopaedia Britannica giving out free one-year subscriptions to web publishers. Michael Arrington writes,

“As an outsider, Britannica’s future is clear. Eventually, and if they don’t go out of business first, they’ll be forced to make all their content freely available on the Internet, and will probably create a wiki-like format that allows user editing. Their differentiating factor from Wikipedia will be that they have experts guiding articles, so they’ll have a claim to be more authoritative.”

This is certainly a valid point, although I still remember the time when the full edition of the Encyclopaedia landed on the shelves in one of Moscow’s major bookstores. I have used the encyclopaedias when I was a student: it was just great to dive into Britannica or Larousse to gain more information or to obtain a different perspective on a subject. Later on, when it came to researching professionally, I’d use the Dictionary of National Biography much more often. As often on such occasions, the habit of taking a dictionary off the shelf dates back to my childhood. We had a thick Large Encyclopaedic Dictionary at home, and as I was growing up and beginning to ask difficult questions, my grandmother would often take the dictionary off the shelf and read it with me.

So, I jumped at the opportunity to apply for a free one-year subscription, and I’m delighted to let you know that I was successful. I took the image of the page to show what you find inside, once you’ve completed the subscription process. On the right, your options are: Featured Video, Britannica Blog, Advocacy for Animals, Geography & Travel, Science & Technology, History & Society, Arts & Entertainment. I opened the History & Society page, and the featured article is on Scottish Enlightenment (do I need to tell you that I want to read it now?). Below are several further options, which include Photo Quiz, Born This Day, Quote of the Day, Featured Contributor, etc.

Furthermore, as an email from J. C. Miller explained,

On that last note, let me point out that you can make any Britannica article available to your readers simply by linking to it from your site. That’s right. Even though portions of the site normally require a subscription to access them, there’s an exception: when a Web site links to a Britannica article, Web surfers who click on that link get that article in its entirety. You can link to as many articles as you like, as often as you like.”

And so, speaking of Born This Day feature… I’d have forgotten about Al Pacino birthday, had it not been for the Encyclopaedia Britannica. Evidently, there are more benefits of being a Britannica subscriber than one would’ve thought, and if you click the link in his name above, you should be able to view the full article on Britannica‘s website. I won’t list all Al Pacino’s films I’ve seen: he’s one of my favourite actors, and naturally I’ve seen more than just one film starring him (by the look at what Wikipedia lists as his “main” works, I’ve almost done my “Essential Al Pacino”). I haven’t seen Angels in America, which is why I’m using a 2004 Golden Globes image of the series team: there you can see not only Al Pacino, but the wonderful Meryl Streep, as well. It gets better though: Al Pacino is currently filming Dali & I: The Surreal Story. And he plays Dali. And opposite him is the Irish prodigy, Cillian Murphy. The film is due to be released in 2009.

My sincere greetings go to Al Pacino and the no less sincere gratitude – to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. Wonderful days, my friends. If any of you wishes to use the generosity of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, please read their blog post about it and follow the instructions.

Working and Walking in Castlefield

I‘ve always wanted to work in the city centre. I also want to live in the city centre, if only to rectify the years I’ve spent travelling everywhere by bus, train, taxi, etc. But I realise that things don’t always happen as quickly as I’d like, so I’m pleased with the result so far.

Every time I travelled to Warrington I used to go past the apartments block along the Bridgewater Canal, and every time I was thinking of how good it would be to live there. I had this strange fascination with the glass walls of the flats. I’m sure you will agree with me that there is something futuristic, ueber-modern, and altogether fashionable about The Box Works building you can see at the top of the post (right).

Just a short walk from here is St Edmund’s church which has been converted into apartments. I had a conversation with a good friend of mine some time ago on the subject of which letting agent to visit and what to expect. Sitting in Odder Bar in Oxford St, we were sieving through the letting offers in one of Manchester’s property magazines. There was a studio on offer in St Edmund’s church, and we briefly contemplated on what it could be like: to live in a church. I’m not particularly superstitious but I’m probably not ready yet for such experience.

Every day I have to go from Bridge St past Granada TV and the Museum of Science and Industry across the bridge to my office. On my way to work I’m being hushed at by the geese (not the most pleasant experience, especially when a goose stands right in the middle of the walk – this way it should be you who’s hushing). On my way from work I’m inundated with runners who these days assemble in groups of 4-8 people. Before long I’ll be feeling like I’m trying to walk through the marathon…



And what it is really interesting is that, in addition to geese (and swans, too), there’s some cattle in Castlefield. At the bottom of the street where I work there is this Hindu cow (left). And not far from the Roman fort there is Sheep monument by Ted Roocroft (1986, right). Curiously, the monument stands not far from The White Lion pub. Sheep, Cows… but all Lions must be sleeping tightly in the Mancunian jungle.

error: Sorry, no copying !!